Legal Opinion

Santana v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 19, 2009No. 07-2024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

Benjamin Santana and Leonardo Santana, a father and son who are natives and citizens of Brazil, petition for review of the denial of their applications for adjustment of status.

The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) determined that the Santanas did not qualify for “grandfathering” under § 245® of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1255®, and thus that they were ineligible for adjustment of status. The BIA issued an opinion affirming the IJ’s decision. We deny the petition.

I

Leonardo Santana and Benjamin Santana entered the United States in 1996 and 2001,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teng v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Da Costa v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Echevarria v. KeislerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. De Acosta v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Nadal-Ginard v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. TORIBIO-CHAVEZ v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Valerio-Ramirez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. Oliveira v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API