Legal Opinion

Osteen v. Comr. of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 25, 1995No. 94-2371PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Harry and Gail Osteen (taxpayers) appeal the United States Tax Court’s decision disallowing certain tax deductions attributable to their farming and horse breeding operation on the grounds that this activity was not engaged in for profit and assessing tax deficiencies and penalties for a substantial tax understatement.

We hold that the Tax Court’s factual findings that the Osteens lacked a profit objective are not clearly erroneous and affirm its decision on that issue. We reverse the Tax Court, however, on its assessment of the understatement penalty because there…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dreicer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Engdahl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  3. E.A. Brannen and Frances K. Brannen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Hunter Faulconer, Sr. And Mary T. Faulconer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Martin Mayrath and Rose Mayrath v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Streber v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Streber v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Long Term Capital Holdings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  4. Estate of Robert G. Kluener, Donald E. Hathaway, Co-Executor, Charlotte J. Kluener v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Bemont Investments, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Tax Matters Partner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API