Sumpter v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
DeBruler, J.
I find that I must dissent from the majority in this case since I cannot agree with its construction of a presumption in all crimes where an element of the offense is the sex of the defendant, and because I believe this statute violates both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution.
In its opinion the majority identifies the “most fundamental element” of this crime as the sex of the defendant and then proceeds to relieve the State from proof of this element by creating a judicial presumption. In criminal cases a court should be extremely…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Danny Ray Lamb v. Lozier BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.