Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Hollman

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1962No. 200PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FITZGERALD, Judge.

Plaintiff, who is the appellant here, brought his claim to obtain judgment on a promissory note. The appellee contends the appellant at an earlier date had retaken possession of a motor vehicle sold on a conditional sales contract and by doing so made an election which now bars a recovery on the note. Trial was before a magistrate who made his findings on which judgment was entered for the appellee. An appeal was taken to the Superior Court which heard the case on the record made by the magistrate. 1 The Superior Court adopted the magistrate’s findings and affirmed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Interstate Ice & Power Corp. v. United States Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Adamson v. AdamsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. ByerlyNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ulster Finance Corp. v. SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BorneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API