Legal Opinion

Stern v. Yasuna

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.

Defendant Satozky moves for judgment by way of contribution between tort-feasors pursuant to CPLR 1401 as against his codefendants in a malpractice action. The action was brought for damages for personal injuries and wrongful death against the owner of a hospital and several physicians. Plaintiff recovered a judgment against all defendants except Leshne and Satozky has paid in satisfaction thereof the total of said judgment. He now seeks recovery from the remaining defendants of their prorata share, amounting to $68,092.92. It appears that all of the defendants appealed the judgment but same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mulligan v. New York UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Salvatore v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API