Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Wiggins

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 9, 2012No. 11-1374PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Steven Carlson, Mary Granzow, Richard Kettells, and William Ramsey (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint and moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, alleging section 16, article V, of the Iowa Constitution, as implemented by Iowa Code sections 46.2, 46.4-46.10, and 46.14, violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection under the laws. The district court 1 denied Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order and scheduled the matter for a hearing on the preliminary injunction motion. The State moved to dismiss,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Navajo Nation v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Navajo Nation v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2015
  3. Dool v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Dool v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. Dool v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API