Legal Opinion

Farnham v. Inland Sea Resort Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 28, 2003No. 02-223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiff David Farnham III appeals from an order of the Grand Isle Superior Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant, Inland Sea Resort Properties, Inc., thus defeating his claims sounding in negligence. Plaintiff was injured in a car accident on defendant’s campground and subsequently sued for damages, alleging that: (1) defendant owed and breached its duty to control consumption of alcohol by underage drinkers on its property; and (2) defendant owed and breached its duty to adequately warn of a dangerous curve in the entrance road to defendant’s campground. While we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Knight v. RowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Baisley v. Missisquoi Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Rubin v. Town of PoultneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. Buzzell v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Demag v. Better Power Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Ainsworth v. Chandler and Chandler Electric Company, Chandler v. Concord Group Insurance Company and Campbell & Boyd Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Everbank, Successor by Assignment to Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Evans v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  5. Cobeo v. Estate of EvansVermont Superior Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API