Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1920No. 10962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment for forgery, etc.; from Decatur superior court— Judge Harrell. September 25, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The indictment in this ease contains two counts, the first charging forgery of a bank check, and the second uttering said check. The indictment alleged that the check was “of the following tenor and effect, to wit: ‘The First National Bank, Bainbridge, Ga. Octo. 1st, 1918. Pay to the order of Frank Johnson $20.00, Twenty dollars, No. 876. Walker.’ A demurrer was filed to the indictment, in part as follows: “1. No crime against the laws of Georgia is charged in said indictment. 3. Defendant demurs specially to said indictment, in that said indictment 1 charges that said check was signed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of Savannah v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Mayor of Savannah v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Tarlor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API