Legal Opinion

Krupp Pm Engineering, Inc v. Honeywell, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1995No. Docket 147162PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Defendant appeals as of right from a judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $220,480, plus interest, costs, and attorney fees, following a jury trial. The basis of plaintiffs case was that defendant had installed a defective part in the controller that monitored plaintiffs furnace. We affirm.

Joseph Krupp and his wife owned plaintiff corporation, which manufactured compact metal parts from powdered metal by heating the parts in a large furnace. Inside plaintiffs furnace was a temperature sensor called a thermocouple that worked with a microprocessor to enable a person to ascertain the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dedes v. AschMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Latimer v. William Mueller & Son, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Kelynack v. Yamaha Motor Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Ledbetter v. Brown City Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Alvery Pack v. Damon Corporation, General R v. CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Webco Industries, Inc. v. Thermatool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Quest Diagnostics, Inc v. MCI Worldcom, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. High v. Capital Senior Living Properties 2—Heatherwood, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API