Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 5, 1986No. 86 Civ. 5010 (VLB)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Oral Decision
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I shall be dealing with the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and the defendants’ motion to stay or dismiss. What I have to say will constitute my findings of fact and conclusions of law for the purposes of the motion for a preliminary injunction.
I find on what is before me that I do have jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a)(1), since more than $10,-000 is involved and the plaintiffs and defendants are from different states. I also find that I have jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. section 78aa and 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Moran v. Household International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Providence & Worcester Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Asarco Inc. v. CourtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Agnew v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Hanson v. Kake Tribal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- CRTF Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- The Amalgamated Sugar Company, Llc v. Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.