Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Parker v. Tate

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1999No. 99-786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Parker failed to allege sufficient facts supporting his claims to withstand dismissal. See State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaul (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 185, 188, 652 N.E.2d 746, 748-749; State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 638, 687 N.E.2d 759, 760. Parker instead relied on conclusory allegations that his “defense was hurt by the many delays” and that his acquittal “removed all factual support” for his revocation. Jackson and Carrion. In fact, the attachments to Parker’s own petition establish that one of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Freeman v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Parole BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Reyes v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Reyes v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Parker v. TateOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API