Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Teese

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1914No. 3476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Johnston County; Nick Wolfe, Judge. Action by G. E. Teese against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. This is an action brought by plaintiff for personal injuries, asking judgment for $1,000, against the defendant, the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. The material allegations of the plaintiff’s petition are as follows: “Second.

Read the full summary

Error from County Court, Johnston County; Nick Wolfe, Judge. Action by G. E. Teese against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. This is an action brought by plaintiff for personal injuries, asking judgment for $1,000, against the defendant, the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. The material allegations of the plaintiff’s petition are as follows: “Second. That on or about the 28th day of March, 1910, the defendant employed plaintiff as a laborer to help other employees of said defendant to construct and repair its…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error will be designated as plaintiff, in accord with their relative titles in the trial court.

The defendant has assigned numerous errors, but in the view we take of this case it will only be necessary to consider one of them.

The attorney for plaintiff was permitted to ask, and the plain-to answer, over objections on the part of the defendant, the following questions:

“Q. You are asking $1,000 damages in this case. How do you arrive at the amount of damages which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Montgomery & West Point Railroad v. VarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  3. Hartley v. Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Howell v. MedlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Burton v. SeveranceOregon Supreme Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. HurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Lusk v. Durant Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API