Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. Ingham County Sheriff
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 1970No. Docket 7,648PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.
The present case is in the nature of habeas corpus proceeding’s and is concerned with the rights of a fugitive at criminal extradition - proceedings.
Doyle Rutledge was convicted of grand larceny- and burglary second degree in Alabama. He es-r caped from custody and was arrested on December 4, 1968 in Ingham County. He was arraigned on a fugitive warrant issued by the Ingham County prosecutor’s office on December 6, 1968. Bond was set in the amount of $100,000. Rutledge petitioned the circuit court for counsel to represent him at extradition: proceeding’s before the Governor. He was advised by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Applications of OppenheimerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- People Ex Rel. Hackler v. LohmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Ex Parte TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Harris v. OgilvieIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Rugg v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Utt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Wertheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Williams v. North CarolinaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Utt v. Warden, Balto. City JailCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Denbow v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TWENTY-FIRST JUD.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.