Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1995No. WCB 91-15616; CA A77263Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Claimant moves for reconsideration of our decision in SAIF v. Bowen, 136 Or App 222, 901 P2d 925 (1995). He argues that our disposition of the case, remanding to the Board with instructions to dismiss, is in error. We allow the motion to reconsider.

Claimant asserts that our statement in the opinion that “[T]he issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board had jurisdiction to determine the appropriateness of proposed medical treatment for claimant” is in error. Id. at 224. Our statement of the issue was correct as far as it went. However, claimant is correct that there is a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API