Legal Opinion

(PC) Dao v. Tabor

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 4, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00846Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CUONG HUY DAO, No. 2: 22-cv-0846 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 P. TABOR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s December 12, 2022 request for 19 clarification regarding whether he should file a supplemental complaint. (ECF No. 26.) 20 This action proceeds on the original complaint against defendants Tabor and Hibbard. 21 (ECF Nos. 1, 11.) Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Common Cause v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API