L.K. v. Poepsel
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
The natural mother, age 25, appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights in her four minor children, A.M.K.(A.), age eight, A.M.K.(A.M.), age six, S.M.K.(S.), age five, and S.M.K.(S.M.), age four. The two eldest children are boys and the two youngest are girls. The juvenile court ordered termination pursuant to §§ 211.447-2(2)(i)b, 211.447-2(1), 211.447-2(2)c, and 211.447-2(2)d RSMo Cum.Supp.1984.1 We affirm.
Appellant contends that there was no clear, cogent and convincing evidence to support termination under the provisions of Chapter 211, that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In the Interest of D.G.N. v. S.M.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Giessow v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- In Interest of J________ Y________Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Juvenile Office of Cape Girardeau County v. M.E.J.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- In the Interest of J.H.H. v. J.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Interest of AMKMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986