Legal Opinion

Teegarden v. Lewis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1895No. 16,698Published

From the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition foe Rehearing.

Hackney, C. J.

— Counsel for the appellee again insist that the finding that Deer was, at the times in question, of “unsound mind,” was a finding of fact, and not a conclusion.

*109We have carefully considered the argument made, and are constrained to adhere to our original holding upon that question. It is urged, also, that when insanity was found, the burden rested upon the appellants to prove that it did not affect the gift, and that since the special verdict omits a finding that such proof was made, the failure in this respect will be deemed the failure of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Highberger v. StifflerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  3. Blough v. ParryIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Woodbury v. WoodburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API