Legal Opinion

Baker v. McDonald

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1905No. 13,892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Dodge county: Conrad Hollenbeck;, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

McDonald brought this action in replevin to recover from Baker certain hay of which he claims to be the absolute owner. On a trial to the court without a jury, judgment went in his favor, and Baker has brought the case here on error.

The parties entered into a contract relating to the hay in question and signed the following memorandum:

“Fremont, Neb., Oct. 9, 1902.
“This day I have sold to Thomas Baker thirty stacks of hay at $2.75 per ton in the stack, for which I have re*597ceived $100. The bay- is to be measured in tbe stack. This bay is to be moved off tbe ground before March 1, 1903.
“…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sharp v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Barker v. DaviesNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Allen v. RushfortNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ross P. Curtice Co. v. KentNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Edwards v. Hastings Distributing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Seldomridge v. Farmers & Merchants BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Starke v. StewartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Tuthill v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API