Legal Opinion
City of McDonough v. Tusk Partners
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 3, 1997No. S97A1175Published
1Opinion of the Court
492 S.E.2d 206 (1997)
268 Ga. 693
CITY OF McDONOUGH et al.
v.
TUSK PARTNERS.
No. S97A1175.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
November 3, 1997.
Reconsideration Denied November 21, 1997.
Kirk Randall Fjelstul, Peter Ralph Olson, Jenkins & Nelson, Cartersville, for City of McDonough et al.
Richard A. Newton, Charles F. Palmer, Troutman Sanders, Atlanta, William S. Hardman, Gainesville, for Tusk Partners.
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
Tusk Partners, a Georgia general partnership, filed an application with the City of McDonough to rezone 19.28 acres of land it contends is in the City of McDonough. Tusk first sought to have the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Guhl v. Holcomb Bridge Road Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Gradous v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Dougherty County v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Bickerstaff Clay Products Co. v. Harris County Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.