Legal Opinion

State v. Almanzar

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2012No. 33,763; Docket 30,600PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence removed from his pocket during a pat-down search. The district court found that the evidence was discovered in a legal pat-down search and that in any event, it would have been inevitably discovered in a search incident to arrest for the misdemeanor domestic battery charge. We conclude that the removal of evidence from Defendant’s pocket exceeded the scope of a legal pat-down search for weapons. In addition, the officers were not statutorily authorized to arrest Defendant for misdemeanor…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. LeyvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AlmanzarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. AlmanzarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API