Legal Opinion

Wright v. Continental Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1928No. 20929. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, C. J.

Richard T. Sandgren, in his lifetime, purchased for one dollar a policy of accident insurance in the respondent company. Across the face of the policy in red letters appeared this warranty:

“This is a Limited Policy.” This statement represented truthfully the character of the insurance issued.

Among the provisions was one that death occasioned “by being accidentally thrown from” an automobile would be compensated for.

The testimony in the case showed that Sandgren, while a passenger in an auto truck, was killed by having his head come in contact with an upright of a bridge through which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lavender v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Doke v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Inter-Southern Life Insurance v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. Malott, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Federal Union Life Insurance v. Richey's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API