Legal Opinion
Waldo & Hughes v. Bell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 15, 1858PublishedCited by 6 opinions
APPEAL from the Sixth District Court of New Orleans, Cotton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Merrick, O. J.
The plaintiffs being the judgment creditors of James M. White, on an intervention in the suit of Kiefe v. White, caused an execution to issue thereon, directed to the Sheriff of the parish of Orleans, for the sum of §1807 11 and interest and costs, with a privilege on the steamboat S. J. E. Trabue. Th of. fa. was dated April 16th, 1856, and made returnable on the first Monday of June thereafter.
The execution not having been returned, the present proceeding was instituted to make the Sheriff responsible for the amount of the execution.
Te proof shows that repeated inquiries were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fleek v. ZillhaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Foster v. Searsport Spool & Block Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- Gehres v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robinson v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- State ex rel. Texada v. CapdevielleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Ban v. Columbia Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Giangrosso v. StraubLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Morere v. Howard Odorless Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.