Hamill v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Action for money had and received, based upon the executed rescission of a transaction involving a sale of a mortgage by the defendant to the plaintiff. Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment under rule 113, Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the cause of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48, subd. 1), and judgment entered pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Cohen v. City Company of New York, 283 N. Y. 112; Steinert v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 258 App. Div. 927; affd., 283 N. Y. 636.)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. City Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Steinert v. Title Guarantee Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Steinert v.Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Agress v. Harmon National Real Estate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940