Miller v. Florida Department of Corrections
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBenton, J.
We have for review an order denying a petition for writ of mandamus, in which appellant alleged that one of two consecutive sentences imposed in 1982 had expired by the time he was released on parole. The mandamus petition alleged that the Department of Corrections (DOC) erroneously forfeited gain time earned on the expired sentence upon revocation of his parole, illegally extending the time he had yet to serve. See Orosz v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 538, 539 (Fla.1997) (holding that a prisoner, “who has fully completed a sentence because of gain time awarded under a proper interpretation of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Topps v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Orosz v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Stanley v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. v. SlaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Name Change of MerchantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Marvin Lancaster v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015