Legal Opinion

Ostling v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1914No. 8143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Lake District Court. — Hon. Charles Cavvender, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

From the foregoing statement it appears that the object of the action instituted by relator is to compel the payment of outstanding registered warrants in the order of registration, out of funds realized from the revenue for the fiscal year beginning in April, 1913; that all the warrants held by relator were issued and registered prior to the beginning of that fiscal year; that the appropriation of funds made by the city authorities for such year was to meet the current expenses of that period, and that no appropriation was made to discharge warrants issued during any previous period.

*26The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Stryker v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. People v. AustinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. Joint Independent School District No. 9Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Eberhart v. CanonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Town of Morrison v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API