Legal Opinion

Maxon v. Chaplin

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County

Decided April 10, 1956No. 731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffith, J.,

Plaintiff, Katherine L. Maxon, obtained a rule on defendants to show cause why the party plaintiff should not be amended from “Katherine L. Maxon” to “Albertine M. Hughes” by reason of the fact that Katherine L. Maxon had conveyed all her interest in the real estate which is the subject of this proceeding to Albertine M. Hughes and also had made an assignment to her of plaintiff’s right of action for damages in trespass against defendants. After obtaining the rule upon defendants, Katherine L. Maxon died.

The cause of action as alleged in the complaint is that defendants removed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Sensenig v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Marsh v. Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Selheimer v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  5. Kaufmann and Baer Co. v. LandauSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Advantage Environmental Consultants, LLC v. Ground Zero Field Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  2. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API