Halliburton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
This appeal is from a conviction for assault with intent to murder, the punishment assessed being three years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion sufficiently states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder, and prosecutes this appeal. He sought to continue the cause on account of the absence of five witnesses, four of whom had been served with process. By each of these witnesses he expected to prove the same facts, to wit, that they were present and witnessed the entire transaction; that the assault was not made with intent to murder; that the accused had no malice towards Mullins, the assaulted party, and that he had no desire and intent to kill or injure Mullins. It is not stated in the bill of exceptions, nor in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Attaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- W. Arnold & Co. v. D. C. Hockney & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rettig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Henson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- O'Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.