Daigle v. State

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Paul Dewey Daigle, Appellant, asserts his constitutional rights were violated by a trial on and proof of an offense that occurred on October 5, 1980, when the indictment alleges it transpired “on or about August 26, 1980”.

He also complains that the State, in his trial for aggravated robbery, failed, because of insufficient evidence, to show the lack of consent on the part of the complainant named in the indictment.

We disagree with his contentions and affirm.

Appellant was found guilty by jury of aggravated robbery and, after proof of eight (8) admitted and stipulated…