Legal Opinion

Dodsworth v. Hopple

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877Published

Error to the District Court of Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

In the original action, brought in the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county, R. B. Hopple and others were plaintiffs, and C. Dodsworth was defendant. The action was brought to recover possession of real property. The plaintiffs averred in their petition that they were the owners of the land and entitled to the possession thereof.

The defendant in his answer took issue on the averments of the petition ; and, by way of cross-petition, set up a state of facts, upon which he claimed that he was in equity entitled to a conveyance of the land in dispute from the plaintiffs, and prayed that they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nimocks v. InksOhio Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Rush v. RushOhio Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API