Legal Opinion

In Re Aztec Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 24, 1990No. Bankruptcy 388-05495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KEITH M. LUNDIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue is whether debtor’s counsel’s fee application should be reduced for intra-office conferences, attendance by two attorneys at the same court hearings, and other “duplications” of effort. Because counsel’s voluntary five percent reduction adequately compensates for any unreasonable or unnecessary “duplicative” billing, the fee application is approved.

I

The debtor filed Chapter 11 on August 24, 1988. Gullett, Sanford, Robinson & Martin was authorized to represent the debtor. The debtor owns and operates an apartment complex.

The debtor filed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re Pettibone Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  2. In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  3. In Re Chicago Lutheran Hospital Ass'nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. In Re Seneca Oil Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1986
  5. In Re Aztec Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of JordanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. In Re Apache Trading Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1999
  3. DVI Receivables XIV, LLC v. RosenbergDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API