Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Lincoln-Williams Twist Drill Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1915No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Assumpsit by Adolph Barlow against the Lincoln-Williams Twist Drill Company for the breach of a contract of sale. Judgment for plaintiff. .Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This is an action to-recover damages from defendant for its refusal to accept and - pay for" 25 tons of high-speed steel, which it contracted for in writing, with the firm of Lowenthal & Co., on June 25, 1910. The defendant is a resident of Massachusetts. Lowenthal & Co. are residents of New York, with an office in Detroit. Lowenthal & Co. assigned their cause of action to Adolph Barlow, a resident of Detroit, and he brought this suit, and at the same time garnished Lowenthal & Co., his assignors, who were owing defendant $1,000 for drills. ‘ Substituted service was made in pursuance of .the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Antcliff v. JuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Copas v. Anglo-American Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Leeman v. McGrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bay County Bar Ass'n v. Finance System, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hanlon v. MangerMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Buckenhizer v. Times Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API