Legal Opinion

State v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 31, 1998No. 96-252PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant Lawrence Lamb appeals his conviction of operating a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2). He contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence derived from an investigatory stop of his vehicle based upon information supplied by an unnamed informant; and (2) admitting the results of a Datamaster infrared breath test. We affirm.

The essential question before the Court is whether, considered in their totality, the circumstances justified a brief investigatory stop based in part upon an unnamed informant’s tip…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. PullyTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Wade Allen WheatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. BoyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API