Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Ontario Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal by defendant is from so much of an order as denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first, second, fourth and fifth causes of action in the complaint. The other causes of action were dismissed. The causes of action here involved are all based upon a contention that defendant has been guilty of bad faith in recovering possession of business space from statutory tenants, “ for the immediate purpose of demolishing the building or other rental area with the intention of constructing a new building ” under subdivision (c) of section 8 of the Business Bent Law (L.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lorenzen v. Mustard's Last Stand, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Jack LaLanne Biltmore Health Spa, Inc. v. Builtland PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. 5-7 Park Avenue Corp. v. Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Mahoney v. AltmanNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Harmor Operating Co. v. Vent-O-Matic Incinerator Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API