Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Allies

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1979No. 14305Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Haswell

I concur in the reversal of defendant’s conviction for the reasons stated in the majority opinion. I dissent from granting a new trial.

The essence of our criminal law is that a man may not be convicted of committing a crime unless it is proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he did so. In re Winship (1970), 397 U.S. 358; 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368; State v. McWilliams (1936), 102 Mont. 313, 57 P.2d 788. Upon reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction, we do not pass on the credibility of the witnesses or the weight to be given their testimony as such matters are the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. State v. LanganMontana Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API