Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1996No. 95-1670PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RunyanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristOhio Supreme Court · 1996