Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1996No. 95-1670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RunyanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristOhio Supreme Court · 1996