Vargas-Rocha v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Juan Vargas-Rocha appeals from his conviction for possessing cocaine with the intent to deliver.
We affirm.
Issues
Appellant did not include a statement in his brief of the issues which are being presented for our review as is required by W.R.A.P. 7.01(d). He does, however, make seven arguments in his brief:
Argument I
Evidence derived from the illegal stop of the vehicle in which Appellant was a passenger, and the subsequent unconstitutional NCIC computer search of his identification, was “fruit of the poisonous tree” and should have been suppressed!)]
Argument II
Appellant’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Ogden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Mitchell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.