Legal Opinion

Vargas-Rocha v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-104PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Juan Vargas-Rocha appeals from his conviction for possessing cocaine with the intent to deliver.

We affirm.

Issues

Appellant did not include a statement in his brief of the issues which are being presented for our review as is required by W.R.A.P. 7.01(d). He does, however, make seven arguments in his brief:

Argument I

Evidence derived from the illegal stop of the vehicle in which Appellant was a passenger, and the subsequent unconstitutional NCIC computer search of his identification, was “fruit of the poisonous tree” and should have been suppressed!)]

Argument II

Appellant’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ogden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mitchell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API