City of Columbia v. Putnam
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentBussey, Justice
(dissenting.)
I regret that I find myself unable to agree with the conclusions reached in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice TAYLOR.
Considering the entire record herein, there is, to my mind, at least a serious question as to the constitutionality of the ordinance when applied to the particular company. However, under the rule that we should refrain from passing upon a constitutional question unless such is necessary to a decision, I refrain from discussing all of the facts and address my remarks only to appellant’s exception number two, which reads as follows:
“His Honor erred in not holding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greenville Baseball, Inc. v. Bearden, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Darling v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Pee Dee Chair Co. v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Southern Fruit Co., Inc. v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Triplett v. City of ChesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.