Legal Opinion
Batchelder v. Mantak
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 14, 1978No. 50-77PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Plaintiff Batchelder brought this action to recover the alleged balance due from the defendants Frank and Ruth Mantak, George and Barbara Trask, and Edward Donnis for labor and services performed for them. The trial court dismissed the action against Donnis. After hearing, the court made findings and conclusions and awarded judgment against the Trasks and the Mantaks.
The lower court’s findings of fact may be summarized as follows. Frank and Ruth Mantak, who own real estate north of Route 11 in Londonderry, Vermont, and George and Barbara Trask, who own real estate south of Route 11, wanted a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Staggers v. Otto Gerdau Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Tracy v. Vinton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bloodworth v. EllisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Donald L. Sweet, Jr. and Preston L. Sweet v. Roy A. St. Pierre and Catherine St. Pierre d/b/a Woodlands FarmsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In Re Estate of ElliottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Circus Studios, Ltd. v. TufoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Appropriate Technology Corp. v. PalmaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.