Scott v. Andrews

I respectfully dissent from the decision and opinion of the majority in this case.

This was a rear end automobile collision which resulted in a suit for personal injuries and damages allegedly resulting therefrom. At the trial, the appellees did *130not offer any evidence and the court directed a verdict as to liability in favor of the appellants. The case went to the jury upon the question of damages only. I would affirm the judgments appealed.

It is suggested in footnote 2 of the majority opinion that the jury may have become “disenchanted” with the appellants by reason of their testimony on…