Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 2004No. 5D04-684PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We find no merit in appellant’s latest appeal and affirm. Moreover, we hold that his successive petitions constitute an abuse of the judicial system. See, e.g., Carlisle v. State, 849 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we order Wilson to show cause within 30 days from the date of this opinion why he should not be precluded from filing any further pro se pleadings raising these issues in this criminal case. See, e.g., State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); Steele v. State, 859 So.2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Steele v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Carlisle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API