Legal Opinion

Pack, Woods & Co. v. Township of Greenbush

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1886PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Iosco. (Tuttle, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This action was commenced by summons, issued out of the circuit court for the county of Iosco, and served by its sheriff on the supervisor of the defendant township, who happened to be in said county at the time the service was made.

The defendant is one of the townships composing the county of Alcona.

*123The suit ■ was brought to recover taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected against the plaintiff.

The defendant pleaded in abatement the foregoing facts* and, upon the trial, the plea was overruled by the court.'Defendant brings error. : ’

The only question raised upon the record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Coldwater v. TuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Mayor of Nashville v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Phillips v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API