Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Spencer Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The appellant, Ashton Martin, who is shown by uncontradicted evidence to be a man of bad character, was found guilty under an indictment charging him with the ■murder of Frank Dulin, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for ten years. On this appeal it is urged as grounds for reversal: (1) that the verdict of the jury was flagrantly against the evidence; (2) that the deputy sheriff in charge of the jury was guilty of misconduct; and (3) that the jury, or at least some of them, were guilty of misconduct.

The evidence…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Ratliff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Fry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Day v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Peay v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API