Legal Opinion

Warden v. The Bratton

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 28, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The claimant-respondent has excepted to twenty-five interrogatories propounded by the libelant, and the libelant has moved for an order directing the claimant-respondent under Rule 32 of the Admiralty Rules, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, to produce a copy of the log of the tug “Bratton” covering June 7th, 1941, and copies of all reports, statements or memoranda covering the towing of the “Eros” on June 7th, 1941.

This action is brought by libelant, as owner of the Houseboat “Eros”, against the Tug “Bratton” and the Raymond Marine Towing Company for damages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. American Mfg. Co. v. ExermontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. American S.S. Co. v. Buckeye S.S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. The VeloxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. The Poling Bros. No. 6District Court, E.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API