State v. Hunt
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Monona District Court. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. The defeudaut was indicted for the crime of seduction. There was a verdict and judgment of guilty. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.
There is abundant evidence of moral depravity in this case, but whether -the evidence is sufficient to prove the particular crime charged is a close question. Inasmuch as a new trial must be awarded on another *258ground, and other evidence may be adduced at another trial, we deem it proper not to enter into a discussion of the evidence at this time.
1. Criminal law: seduction: evidence: exhibition of child. At the time of the commission of the alleged crime the defendant and the prosecuting witness were each about seventeen years of age. This was on February 8, 1908. A child was born to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HastySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Brady v. MatternSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State v. HelmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- State v. DanforthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. ProctorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- State v. NathooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- State v. ReynardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Merritt v. LeuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.