Legal Opinion

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Pritzker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2016No. 14-16375PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a challenging question relating to the proper scope under the Marine Mammal Protection’ Act (MMPA) of mitigation measures required to protect marine mammals when the responsible federal agency, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), seeks to approve incidental “take” relating to military readiness activities. The appeal concerns the Navy’s peacetime use of Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System Low Frequency Active sonar (SURTASS LFA or “LFA sonar”). 1 Congress has required that NMFS set limitations on activities that may cause “take” —…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Ramos v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Calderon-Rodriguez v. WilcoxDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  4. TX Assn of Manufacturers v. CPSCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. Ecological Rights Found. v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API