Legal Opinion

Brand v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover for personal injuries and for loss of services, the undisputed evidence shows that the accident took place when plaintiff Matilda Brand stepped into a pool of water and fell as she *631was entering a turnstile on the platform of defendant’s subway station. The complaint was dismissed at the close of plaintiffs' case. Judgment affirmed., with costs. There was no showing of negligence for which defendant is liable. (Kraus v. Wolf, 253 N. Y. 300; Boyne v. City of Buffalo, 269 id. 657.) Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Carswell, J., dissent and vote…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kraus v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abair v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API