Legal Opinion

Hamilton Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1962No. Appeal, 442PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The appellants, as residents and taxpayers of the City of Philadelphia, petitioned the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County to convene a special grand jury to investigate alleged corruption in the city government. The court refused the request and dismissed the petitions. From that order, this appeal is prosecuted.

Following the entry of the appeal, a motion to quash was filed. Because of the nature of the proceedings and its serious public connotations, the Court decided to deny the motion to quash and hear the matter out. Counsel for all parties were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keystone Raceway Corp. v. State Harness Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Ritter Finance Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Elliott EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Easton Transit Co.'s PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Smith v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Gismondi Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. In re January 1974 Philadelphia County Grand Jury InvestigationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API