Legal Opinion

Baranko v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 21, 1984No. AV-109, AV-110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

448 So.2d 1067 (1984)

Frank J. BARANKO, Petitioner,

v.

Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Respondent.

Nos. AV-109, AV-110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 1984.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1984.

Frank J. Baranko, petitioner pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gregory C. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

2Per curiam

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that his gain-time had not been properly calculated in accordance with Section 944.275, Fla. Stat. (1983), and that, had it been properly calculated, he was entitled to immediate release.[1] After issuing a show cause…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kimmons v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandsbury Lee v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. King v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Sandsbury Lee v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Sandsbury Lee v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Sandsbury Lee v. Richard L. DuggerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API