Legal Opinion

Marlin v. Sipprell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1904No. Nos. 14,103—(43)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wadena county, Baxter, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $308.92.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover a commission alleged to be due plaintiffs for services rendered in procuring a purchaser for defendant’s farm. Plaintiffs had a verdict in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying a hew trial.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiffs are real estate agents doing business at Staples, Minnesota. Defendant owned a farm consisting of three hundred twenty acres, which he listed with them for sale at $26 per acre, and agreed, in case they found a purchaser at that price, to pay them the sum of $300 for their services. Part of the land constituted defendant’s…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koffman v. PackMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chas. W. Eddy & Co. v. HinchmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API