Legal Opinion

Lundy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1999No. 98-00866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana. Of the four issues raised on appeal, we find merit only in the last issue that the written replevin order did not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. We therefore affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence without discussion, but remand for conformance of the written order to the oral pronouncement.

Appellant filed a pro se motion for replevin requesting the return of any money he possessed at the time of his arrest. The trial court granted the motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API